Health Center Database
← All health centers

SUNRISE COMMUNITY HEALTH

2930 11th Ave, Evans, CO, 80620-1011

H80CS00804Nonprofit 501(c)(3)EIN 84-0613289FYE MarUrban
Mitzi Moran
Project director

Latest — UDS 2025

UDS reporting always covers January to December, which is what makes these directly comparable across centers.

Patients
45,02288
Growth
+3.6%
Sites
14
Cost / patient
$1,276.9837
Operating margin
+15.7%
Medicaid share
45.6%

Operations

7 reporting years

YearPatientsVisitsMedicaidUninsured≤200% FPLFTE
202545,022121,81045.6%30.0%53.0%442.25
202443,45042.4%29.7%49.4%
202339,482103,70946.9%27.4%51.5%371.98
202240,018114,27553.4%25.4%56.4%361.55
202140,50352.6%25.1%62.4%
202041,03350.2%26.9%71.7%
201941,97248.9%27.3%67.5%

IRS Form 990

EIN 840613289 · figures exactly as filed, each with the period it covers

PeriodRevenueExpensesNetAssetsStaff
FY2025Apr 2024 – Mar 2025$67.0M$62.1M$4.9M$114.0M585XML
FY2024Apr 2023 – Mar 2024$65.9M$55.0M$10.9M$65.0M612XML
FY2023Apr 2022 – Mar 2023$56.7M$53.3M$3.4M$53.7M509XML
FY2022Apr 2021 – Mar 2022$54.5M$48.1M$6.4M$52.3M525XML
FY2021Apr 2020 – Mar 2021$48.8M$44.8M$4.0M$49.7M405XML
FY2019Apr 2018 – Mar 2019$42.5M$40.8M$1.7M$38.6M510XML

Vendors and contractors

IRS Form 990 Part VII-B lists only the five highest-paid independent contractors at or above $100,000. A vendor below that threshold does not appear — absence here means 'not in the top five', never 'no vendor'.

VendorServiceLocationAmount
FCI CONSTRUCTIONCONSTRUCTIONFREDERICK, CO$8,998,767
STRATUS INDEMANDTRANSLATION SERVICESDETROIT, MI$700,503
ARC INCORPORATEDJANITORIALFORT COLLINS, CO$525,826
LABCORP OF AMERICA HOLDINGSLAB SERVICESBURLINGTON, NC$475,852
BANNER IMAGING SERVICES COLORADO LLCMEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIOLOGYLOS ANGELES, CA$283,228

22 contractor records across 6 filing years — vendor switches and tenure are computed from this history.

Single audits

Uniform Guidance audits across every federal program, not only the Health Center Program — a material weakness is one regardless of which award surfaced it.

YearAuditorFederal spendFindingsFlags
2025Clifton Larson Allen LLP$14.3M1
Low risk
2024CliftonLarsonAllen LLP$16.5M0
2023CliftonLarsonAllen LLP$15.2M12
2022CHW LLP$13.8M0
Low risk
2021CHW, LLP$13.0M0
Low risk
2020CHW, LLP$10.9M0
Low risk
2019CHW, LLP$11.0M0
Low risk
4 findings with auditor text and corrective action plans
2025 · 2025-001Material weakness

Criteria or Specific Requirement Per Title 42 Chapter 1 Subchapter D Section 51c303(f), “Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of the patient’s ability to pay.” Condition and Context During our testing of 40 sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified four visits where an incorrect sliding fee was given to a patient based on their income and family size. Effect Potential that a patient would not receive the appropriate sliding fee discount. Questioned Costs None identified. Cause The sliding fee discount error was a result of a dental electronic medical rec

Corrective action: Federal Program: Consolidated Health Centers Grant Assistance Listing No. 93.224 & 93.527 Recommendation: Our auditors recommended the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilized for each sliding fee encounter. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization will review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilize

2023 · 2023-001

Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions. Condition and Context During our testing over suspension and debarment, we noted the three instances in which the Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into a transaction with a vendor. Effect The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance could result in possible federal funds being provided to ineligible vendors. Questioned Costs None identified. Cause The Organization lacks established internal controls and procedures over financial grant management. The Organization did not perform the suspension and

Corrective action: Recommendation: Our auditors recommended that the Organization implement a process to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed and documentation to show that the checks are occuring prior to entering into transactions with vendors. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Suspension and Debarment checks were occuring prior to a transaction with a new vendor; however, the checks were not saved. Any new vendor will have a check, and if we check them manually, we will begin to save these checks as documentation. We also implemented Compliatrics early in 2022 where we can enter our vendors in

2023 · 2023-002

Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions. Condition and Context We noted the Organization is not in compliance with requirements related to Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. During our testing, we noted the following exceptions: • SCH The Organization’s procurement policy did not meet the requirements defined by 2 CFR 200. • The Organization did not retain support to document the procurement methods followed (I.e., sole source, small purchases, sealed bids, proposals, etc.). Effect The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible federal funds provided to ineligible

Corrective action: Recommendation: Our auditors had the following recommendations: 1. Our auditors recommended the Organization review and update its procurement policy to ensure the policy meets the 2 CFR Part 200 Procurement requirements. 2. Our auditors recommend the Organization retain all documentation and support to show that the procurement policy was followed. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization will be reviewing and updating our procurement policy for any missing items not currently noted in our policies or procedures. Gateway and RC Telecom are our sole-source vendors based on the scope

2023 · 2023-003

Criteria or Specific Requirement Per Title 42 Chapter 1 Subchapter D Section 51c303(f), “Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of the patient’s ability to pay.” Condition and Context During our testing of forty sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified two visits that received the incorrect sliding fee discount. Effect Potential that a patient would not receive the appropriate sliding fee discount. Questioned Costs None identified. Cause Clerical error in which the incorrect discount was applied due to lack of an oversight process in place. Recommendation We

Corrective action: Recommendation: Our auditors recommended the Organization review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilitzed for each sliding fee encounter. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization's enrollment and billing department will work together to identify when any errors occur based on the documentation the patient provides. The enrollment team will verify the rate, and the billing and coding team will begin checking to ensure the rate that the patient was screene

Leadership

Form 990 Part VII-A, FY2025

NameTitleReported comp
MITZI MORANCEO$284,343
KARL KOHLGRAFDENTIST$218,329
SEAN FILIPOVITZPHYSICIAN$207,729
CATHY WOLFFCFO$194,038
BRYCE SPITZEPHYSICIAN$190,192
JUSTIN WALKERPHYSICIAN$189,156
CASSANDRA LYNNE SANCHEZDIRECTOR - ANCILLARY SERVICES$185,238
MARILYN SCHOCKPRESIDENT$0
JUAN GOMEZVICE PRESIDENT$0
GENE O'HARATREASURER$0
GINA PAYNESECRETARY$0
BRUCE COOPERDIRECTOR$0

Service delivery sites

14 sites, updated daily from HRSA

MONFORT FAMILY CLINICEvans, COAll Other Clinic Types
Sunrise Centennial Children's ClinicEvans, COSchool
Sunrise Community Health Mobile ServicesEvans, COAll Other Clinic Types
Bond Children's ClinicGreeley, COSchool
MONFORT CHILDREN'S CLINICGreeley, COAll Other Clinic Types
SUNRISE ADELANTE CLINICGreeley, COAll Other Clinic Types
SUNRISE FAMILY DENTAL CLINICGreeley, COAll Other Clinic Types
SUNRISE NORTH RANGE CLINICGreeley, COAll Other Clinic Types
Sunrise Madison Children's ClinicGreeley, COSchool
North Loveland Community Health CenterLoveland, COAll Other Clinic Types
SUNRISE SUMMITSTONE CLINICLoveland, COAll Other Clinic Types
South Loveland Community Health CenterLoveland, COAll Other Clinic Types
Sunrise Thompson Health ClinicLoveland, COSchool
Sunrise Windsor ClinicWindsor, COAll Other Clinic Types

Where this data came from

Every figure above traces to a government filing. This is what makes a number defensible in a client conversation rather than something to re-derive by hand.

HRSA
BHCMISID 080140 · grant H80CS00804 · reported 20192025
IRS identity
EIN 840613289 as Sunrise Community Health(name_geo, confidence 0.95)
name 1.00 + city confirmed
Fiscal year
Ends Mar — IRS figures cover a different twelve months than UDS
Known gaps
1 source-year missing
EIN resolved, filing deadline passed, no Form 990 in the IRS index