SUNRISE COMMUNITY HEALTH
2930 11th Ave, Evans, CO, 80620-1011
Latest — UDS 2025
UDS reporting always covers January to December, which is what makes these directly comparable across centers.
Operations
7 reporting years
| Year | Patients | Visits | Medicaid | Uninsured | ≤200% FPL | FTE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 45,022 | 121,810 | 45.6% | 30.0% | 53.0% | 442.25 |
| 2024 | 43,450 | — | 42.4% | 29.7% | 49.4% | — |
| 2023 | 39,482 | 103,709 | 46.9% | 27.4% | 51.5% | 371.98 |
| 2022 | 40,018 | 114,275 | 53.4% | 25.4% | 56.4% | 361.55 |
| 2021 | 40,503 | — | 52.6% | 25.1% | 62.4% | — |
| 2020 | 41,033 | — | 50.2% | 26.9% | 71.7% | — |
| 2019 | 41,972 | — | 48.9% | 27.3% | 67.5% | — |
IRS Form 990
EIN 840613289 · figures exactly as filed, each with the period it covers
| Period | Revenue | Expenses | Net | Assets | Staff | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025Apr 2024 – Mar 2025 | $67.0M | $62.1M | $4.9M | $114.0M | 585 | XML |
| FY2024Apr 2023 – Mar 2024 | $65.9M | $55.0M | $10.9M | $65.0M | 612 | XML |
| FY2023Apr 2022 – Mar 2023 | $56.7M | $53.3M | $3.4M | $53.7M | 509 | XML |
| FY2022Apr 2021 – Mar 2022 | $54.5M | $48.1M | $6.4M | $52.3M | 525 | XML |
| FY2021Apr 2020 – Mar 2021 | $48.8M | $44.8M | $4.0M | $49.7M | 405 | XML |
| FY2019Apr 2018 – Mar 2019 | $42.5M | $40.8M | $1.7M | $38.6M | 510 | XML |
Vendors and contractors
IRS Form 990 Part VII-B lists only the five highest-paid independent contractors at or above $100,000. A vendor below that threshold does not appear — absence here means 'not in the top five', never 'no vendor'.
| Vendor | Service | Location | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| FCI CONSTRUCTION | CONSTRUCTION | FREDERICK, CO | $8,998,767 |
| STRATUS INDEMAND | TRANSLATION SERVICES | DETROIT, MI | $700,503 |
| ARC INCORPORATED | JANITORIAL | FORT COLLINS, CO | $525,826 |
| LABCORP OF AMERICA HOLDINGS | LAB SERVICES | BURLINGTON, NC | $475,852 |
| BANNER IMAGING SERVICES COLORADO LLC | MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIOLOGY | LOS ANGELES, CA | $283,228 |
22 contractor records across 6 filing years — vendor switches and tenure are computed from this history.
Single audits
Uniform Guidance audits across every federal program, not only the Health Center Program — a material weakness is one regardless of which award surfaced it.
| Year | Auditor | Federal spend | Findings | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Clifton Larson Allen LLP | $14.3M | 1 | Low risk |
| 2024 | CliftonLarsonAllen LLP | $16.5M | 0 | |
| 2023 | CliftonLarsonAllen LLP | $15.2M | 12 | |
| 2022 | CHW LLP | $13.8M | 0 | Low risk |
| 2021 | CHW, LLP | $13.0M | 0 | Low risk |
| 2020 | CHW, LLP | $10.9M | 0 | Low risk |
| 2019 | CHW, LLP | $11.0M | 0 | Low risk |
4 findings with auditor text and corrective action plans
Criteria or Specific Requirement Per Title 42 Chapter 1 Subchapter D Section 51c303(f), “Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of the patient’s ability to pay.” Condition and Context During our testing of 40 sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified four visits where an incorrect sliding fee was given to a patient based on their income and family size. Effect Potential that a patient would not receive the appropriate sliding fee discount. Questioned Costs None identified. Cause The sliding fee discount error was a result of a dental electronic medical rec…
Corrective action: Federal Program: Consolidated Health Centers Grant Assistance Listing No. 93.224 & 93.527 Recommendation: Our auditors recommended the Organization to review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilized for each sliding fee encounter. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization will review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording, and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilize…
Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions. Condition and Context During our testing over suspension and debarment, we noted the three instances in which the Organization did not perform the suspension and debarment check prior to entering into a transaction with a vendor. Effect The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance could result in possible federal funds being provided to ineligible vendors. Questioned Costs None identified. Cause The Organization lacks established internal controls and procedures over financial grant management. The Organization did not perform the suspension and …
Corrective action: Recommendation: Our auditors recommended that the Organization implement a process to ensure suspension and debarment checks are performed and documentation to show that the checks are occuring prior to entering into transactions with vendors. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Suspension and Debarment checks were occuring prior to a transaction with a new vendor; however, the checks were not saved. Any new vendor will have a check, and if we check them manually, we will begin to save these checks as documentation. We also implemented Compliatrics early in 2022 where we can enter our vendors in…
Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement and suspension and debarment. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with these provisions. Condition and Context We noted the Organization is not in compliance with requirements related to Procurement, Suspension and Debarment. During our testing, we noted the following exceptions: • SCH The Organization’s procurement policy did not meet the requirements defined by 2 CFR 200. • The Organization did not retain support to document the procurement methods followed (I.e., sole source, small purchases, sealed bids, proposals, etc.). Effect The auditor noted instances of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible federal funds provided to ineligible…
Corrective action: Recommendation: Our auditors had the following recommendations: 1. Our auditors recommended the Organization review and update its procurement policy to ensure the policy meets the 2 CFR Part 200 Procurement requirements. 2. Our auditors recommend the Organization retain all documentation and support to show that the procurement policy was followed. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization will be reviewing and updating our procurement policy for any missing items not currently noted in our policies or procedures. Gateway and RC Telecom are our sole-source vendors based on the scope …
Criteria or Specific Requirement Per Title 42 Chapter 1 Subchapter D Section 51c303(f), “Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of the patient’s ability to pay.” Condition and Context During our testing of forty sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified two visits that received the incorrect sliding fee discount. Effect Potential that a patient would not receive the appropriate sliding fee discount. Questioned Costs None identified. Cause Clerical error in which the incorrect discount was applied due to lack of an oversight process in place. Recommendation We …
Corrective action: Recommendation: Our auditors recommended the Organization review internal controls in regards to the determination, recording and monitoring of the sliding fee process to ensure that appropriate sliding fee rates/categories are utilitzed for each sliding fee encounter. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Organization's enrollment and billing department will work together to identify when any errors occur based on the documentation the patient provides. The enrollment team will verify the rate, and the billing and coding team will begin checking to ensure the rate that the patient was screene…
Leadership
Form 990 Part VII-A, FY2025
| Name | Title | Reported comp |
|---|---|---|
| MITZI MORAN | CEO | $284,343 |
| KARL KOHLGRAF | DENTIST | $218,329 |
| SEAN FILIPOVITZ | PHYSICIAN | $207,729 |
| CATHY WOLFF | CFO | $194,038 |
| BRYCE SPITZE | PHYSICIAN | $190,192 |
| JUSTIN WALKER | PHYSICIAN | $189,156 |
| CASSANDRA LYNNE SANCHEZ | DIRECTOR - ANCILLARY SERVICES | $185,238 |
| MARILYN SCHOCK | PRESIDENT | $0 |
| JUAN GOMEZ | VICE PRESIDENT | $0 |
| GENE O'HARA | TREASURER | $0 |
| GINA PAYNE | SECRETARY | $0 |
| BRUCE COOPER | DIRECTOR | $0 |
Service delivery sites
14 sites, updated daily from HRSA
| MONFORT FAMILY CLINIC | Evans, CO | All Other Clinic Types |
| Sunrise Centennial Children's Clinic | Evans, CO | School |
| Sunrise Community Health Mobile Services | Evans, CO | All Other Clinic Types |
| Bond Children's Clinic | Greeley, CO | School |
| MONFORT CHILDREN'S CLINIC | Greeley, CO | All Other Clinic Types |
| SUNRISE ADELANTE CLINIC | Greeley, CO | All Other Clinic Types |
| SUNRISE FAMILY DENTAL CLINIC | Greeley, CO | All Other Clinic Types |
| SUNRISE NORTH RANGE CLINIC | Greeley, CO | All Other Clinic Types |
| Sunrise Madison Children's Clinic | Greeley, CO | School |
| North Loveland Community Health Center | Loveland, CO | All Other Clinic Types |
| SUNRISE SUMMITSTONE CLINIC | Loveland, CO | All Other Clinic Types |
| South Loveland Community Health Center | Loveland, CO | All Other Clinic Types |
| Sunrise Thompson Health Clinic | Loveland, CO | School |
| Sunrise Windsor Clinic | Windsor, CO | All Other Clinic Types |
Where this data came from
Every figure above traces to a government filing. This is what makes a number defensible in a client conversation rather than something to re-derive by hand.
- HRSA
- BHCMISID 080140 · grant H80CS00804 · reported 2019–2025
- IRS identity
- EIN 840613289 as Sunrise Community Health(name_geo, confidence 0.95)name 1.00 + city confirmed
- Fiscal year
- Ends Mar — IRS figures cover a different twelve months than UDS
- Known gaps
- 1 source-year missingEIN resolved, filing deadline passed, no Form 990 in the IRS index